top of page

Top Ten Defenses to DUI Crimes in California: VC 23152 DUI Criminal Defense Lawyers

Introduction: DUI offenses in California carry serious legal consequences, including fines, license suspension, and potential imprisonment. The complexity of DUI cases necessitates robust defense strategies to challenge the prosecution's evidence and protect the defendants' rights.


This article identifies and analyzes ten effective defenses to DUI charges in California, exploring legal precedents, procedural requirements, and scientific principles that influence case outcomes. By examining these defenses in depth, the article aims to inform legal professionals, DUI attorneys, DUI defendants, and the public about the intricacies of common DUI defenses in California.


1. Lack of Probable Cause: One of the primary defenses to DUI charges involves challenging the legality of the traffic stop or arrest. Under California law, law enforcement officers must have reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a vehicle and conduct DUI testing. A successful defense may argue that the stop was unlawful or that the officer lacked sufficient justification to detain the defendant.


2. Improper Administration of Field Sobriety Tests: Field sobriety tests (FSTs), such as the walk-and-turn, Rhomberg test (balance test), or horizontal gaze nystagmus test (eye test), are commonly used to assess impairment during traffic stops. Defense attorneys may challenge the administration of these tests, citing improper instructions, environmental factors, or physical conditions that could affect test results and lead to false positives for DUI.


3. Inaccurate Breathalyzer or Blood Test Results: Breathalyzer and blood tests are crucial pieces of evidence in DUI cases, but they are not infallible. Defenses may challenge the accuracy of these tests by questioning calibration records, chain of custody procedures, or the qualifications of the testing personnel. Factors such as medical conditions or diet could also influence test results.


4. Rising Blood Alcohol Content (BAC): The concept of rising BAC defense asserts that a defendant's BAC was below the legal limit at the time of driving but increased to an illegal level by the time testing occurred. This defense relies on scientific principles and expert testimony to establish that alcohol absorption continued after driving ceased.


5. Necessity Defense: In rare circumstances, the necessity defense may be invoked if driving under the influence was necessary to prevent a greater harm. For example, a defendant might argue that they drove intoxicated to escape imminent danger or to seek medical assistance in an emergency situation. For more information, see Necessity Defense.


6. Medical Conditions or Prescription Drugs: Certain medical conditions or the use of prescription medications can mimic symptoms of intoxication. Defense attorneys may present medical evidence to demonstrate that a defendant's was not impaired due to alcohol or drug consumption, but rather, his symptoms mimic intoxication due to a legitimate medical condition or a medication that has an effect on the body, but not the driver’s ability to otherwise safely drive a vehicle without impairment.


7. Violation of Miranda Rights: If law enforcement officers fail to properly advise a defendant of their Miranda rights (right to remain silent, right to an attorney, and more), any statements made during custodial interrogation may be suppressed. This defense focuses on procedural safeguards to protect defendants' constitutional rights during the arrest and questioning process. For more information, see Miranda Rights.


8. Lack of Proper Documentation or Chain of Custody: Evidence in DUI cases, such as breathalyzer results or blood samples, must be properly documented and handled according to legal standards. Defense attorneys may challenge the chain of custody procedures or documentation errors to undermine the reliability of evidence presented by the prosecution.


9. Faulty Police Procedures or Misconduct: Allegations of police misconduct, such as coercion, unlawful search and seizure, or biased behavior, can undermine the prosecution's case. DUI Defense attorneys may scrutinize police reports, dashcam footage, or witness testimonies to uncover procedural errors or violations of defendants' rights.


10. Alternative Explanations for Driving Behavior: Defense strategies may also focus on providing alternative explanations for observed driving behavior that led to suspicion of DUI. Factors such as fatigue, distraction, or unfamiliarity with road conditions could be presented to challenge the prosecution's assertion of impairment.


Other defense to DUI charges, including VC 23152(a) and VC 23152(b) charges (Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol), include plea bargain for a lesser crime, such as a wet reckless, violation of the statute of limitations, and alibi defense (alibi defense is most often used in hit and run cases related to DUI where the identity of the driver is unclear).


Note: DUI defense includes possible defense at the administrative per se (Admin Per Se) hearing at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The DMV Admin Per Se hearing is concerned with the defendant’s driver’s license after a DUI citation or arrest. For more specific information on DMV hearings related to DUI crimes, see Admin Per Se hearing.


Conclusion: In conclusion, effective defense strategies play a crucial role in DUI cases in California, where the legal landscape is complex and the stakes are high, especially in felony DUI cases. By understanding and leveraging these ten defenses—ranging from procedural challenges to scientific principles—DUI defense attorneys can protect defendants' rights and challenge the prosecution's case effectively.


For more information on defense to DUI crimes, contact our DUI criminal defense attorneys today for a free consultation. Our team of highly qualified DUI criminal defense attorneys have successfully handled thousands of misdemeanor and felony offenses, including DUI crimes charged under VC 23152, VC 23152, and VC 23140.


We cover all Inland Empire criminal courts, including the courts and cities of San Bernardino, Riverside, Banning, Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Yucaipa, Redlands, Victorville, Rialto, Moreno Valley, and more. Call today!


909-913-3138


Further Reading



VC 23152, vc, vc 23153, vc 23140, drunk driving, misdemeanor, felony, jail, sentence, dmv, license, jail, prison, attorney, lawyer, rialto, redlands, san bernardino, fontana, colton, ontario, victorville, yucaipa, rancho cucamonga
DUI Criminal Defense Attorneys VC 23152

bottom of page